Provider directory · Technical review not assessed
Trail of Bits
Review the source evidence before requesting a proposal. Confirm that the assigned team, scope and deliverables match your project.
Official provider website
Evidence and engagement scope
Source check: . A provider statement is attributed information. A confirmed field refers only to the cited artifact.
- Audit networks
- EVMConfirmed in cited evidence · Checked 2026-09-05. Named in the sampled Kiln Lagoon report; this is evidence of that engagement, not universal coverage. Source for audit networks
- Audit languages
- SolidityConfirmed in cited evidence · Checked 2026-09-05. Named in the sampled Kiln Lagoon report; this is evidence of that engagement, not universal coverage. Source for audit languages
- Services and methods
- Smart contract audit, Fix reviewConfirmed in cited evidence · Checked 2026-09-05. Documented in one public vault review; no provider-wide quality rating. Source for services and methods
- Protocol types in reviewed reports
- Tokenized vaultConfirmed in cited evidence · Checked 2026-09-05. Types observed in the report examples below, not an exhaustive provider portfolio. Source for protocol types in reviewed reports
- Current pricing
- Request a scoped quote; no current price verifiedInsufficient evidence · Checked 2026-09-05. Not established from the public sources checked in this pass. Request current evidence from the provider.
- Availability
- Confirm directly with providerInsufficient evidence · Checked 2026-09-05. Not established from the public sources checked in this pass. Request current evidence from the provider.
Public report examples
These observations apply to named scopes and code revisions. They do not establish the safety of a current deployment.
Kiln Lagoon Vault v0.6.0
Final report: . Source checked .
- Protocol type
- Tokenized vault
- Scope
- Solidity EVM vault differential review; targets include initialization, settlement and fee calculation changes.
- Code revision
- d07028d43c77d3519bae8689d2af4b8ee313c39f; additional targets 37a84cb and a8e73f5
- Follow-up evidence
- Fix review completed April 29, 2026. The report links the fee fix to PR #309; the sanctions-list revert behavior remained intentional.
- Limit
- Differential scope, not a complete re-audit of every vault dependency. The report’s target and fix revisions must be checked before reuse.
Sources were checked on September 5, 2026. This is a bounded public-source review, not a technical endorsement. Report examples cover named versions only. Confirm the proposed scope, price and available team with the provider.
DSA research and technical review
Read the original evidence review for Trail of Bits. It includes measurements, primary sources, limitations and a downloadable PDF.
No independent committee assessment or technical score has been issued. The proposed review procedure requires two qualified reviewers, conflict checks, recent relevant reports and supported findings across seven criteria.
What to include in your request
- Code repository, intended revision, chain, language and protocol design.
- High-risk operations, trust assumptions, privileged roles and exclusions.
- Target start, budget, release deadline and required fix-review allowance.
- A request for three recent comparable project reports and the reviewers assigned to your project.