Security research
Source Hat audit evidence: dated updates and private scope
The Hyperbolic Protocol page records dated updates around a named private-repository revision. The private scope is a material limit: a reader can inspect the published findings but cannot independently reproduce the full source comparison from the public page alone. Ask for authorized access to the reviewed revision before making a deployment-match claim.
Read the update trail before relying on the latest label
Use this question to examine the evidence below before carrying an earlier observation into a new engagement.
Separate the historical observation from a current decision
This URL continues the former Source Hat company-analysis entry under the Source Hat identity. The earlier article included broad composite scores and incident narratives. A historic association with an incident does not establish whether the vulnerable revision was reviewed or excluded.
This editorial revision replaces unsupported general praise and does not reproduce the old aggregate rating. DSA has not assigned a new technical score.
Hyperbolic Protocol: the evidence boundary
Read the source report. Latest update in reviewed report: .
- Reviewed scope
- Lending contracts with Uniswap V3 TWAP dependencies; private repository revisions and deployed Ethereum/Arbitrum references.
- Revision evidence
- f9a67070bb7d05b01c5d74c89b009686e2e66325
- Follow-up
- A dated change history runs from April 2023 to March 2024. Findings retain resolved and open outcomes.
- Limit of the observation
- The repository is private. A public commit identifier alone does not make the entire reviewed code independently reproducible.
Build the release decision around traceable evidence
- Pin the proposed source revision and identify the contracts and dependencies included in the review.
- Choose a material finding in the relevant report. Trace its affected code and record the final disposition.
- Compare the reviewed revision with the intended deployment. Document subsequent changes and unresolved assumptions.
- Confirm the retest scope, assigned reviewers and current commercial terms directly.
Use the Source Hat profile for field-level sources and the transaction simulation guide to plan the related technical checks. A tool result supplements the evidence packet; it does not replace a scoped audit.
Prepare an audit request with Source Hat or compare other providers.
Sources
Checked . Local examples include their inputs and limits.
About this revision
Rebuilt the legacy company analysis around source scope, dated evidence and limits of historical claims. The URL is preserved. This is a DeFiSec editorial revision, not a new assessment by the provider or an expert committee.
Suggest a correction with evidence