Provider directory · Technical review not assessed
Quantstamp
Review the source evidence before requesting a proposal. Confirm that the assigned team, scope and deliverables match your project.
Official provider website
Evidence and engagement scope
Source check: . A provider statement is attributed information. A confirmed field refers only to the cited artifact.
- Audit networks
- Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, Avalanche, ArbitrumProvider statement · Checked 2026-09-05. Stated on the provider website; scope must be agreed for each engagement. Source for audit networks
- Audit languages
- SolidityConfirmed in cited evidence · Checked 2026-09-05. Confirmed for the MakerDAO Liquidations 2.0 engagement. This is not an exhaustive language portfolio. Source for audit languages
- Services and methods
- Smart contract audit, Formal verification, MonitoringProvider statement · Checked 2026-09-05. Stated on the provider website; scope must be agreed for each engagement. Source for services and methods
- Protocol types in reviewed reports
- Collateral liquidationConfirmed in cited evidence · Checked 2026-09-05. Types observed in the report examples below, not an exhaustive provider portfolio. Source for protocol types in reviewed reports
- Current pricing
- Request a scoped quote; no current price verifiedInsufficient evidence · Checked 2026-09-05. Not established from the public sources checked in this pass. Request current evidence from the provider.
- Availability
- Confirm directly with providerInsufficient evidence · Checked 2026-09-05. Not established from the public sources checked in this pass. Request current evidence from the provider.
Public report examples
These observations apply to named scopes and code revisions. They do not establish the safety of a current deployment.
MakerDAO Liquidations 2.0
Report date: . Source checked .
- Protocol type
- Collateral liquidation
- Scope
- Solidity dss contracts clip.sol, dog.sol and abaci.sol; EVM Muir Glacier context.
- Code revision
- 8aae83
- Follow-up evidence
- The PDF includes a reaudit update with distinct fixed, mitigated and acknowledged outcomes.
- Limit
- Historical review of three files. The report does not establish the state of later Maker/Sky deployments.
Sources were checked on September 5, 2026. This is a bounded public-source review, not a technical endorsement. Report examples cover named versions only. Confirm the proposed scope, price and available team with the provider.
DSA research and technical review
Read the original evidence review for Quantstamp. It includes measurements, primary sources, limitations and a downloadable PDF.
No independent committee assessment or technical score has been issued. The proposed review procedure requires two qualified reviewers, conflict checks, recent relevant reports and supported findings across seven criteria.
What to include in your request
- Code repository, intended revision, chain, language and protocol design.
- High-risk operations, trust assumptions, privileged roles and exclusions.
- Target start, budget, release deadline and required fix-review allowance.
- A request for three recent comparable project reports and the reviewers assigned to your project.